Davi Querino Federal University of Paraba 1. Introduction This article has for objective to point out and to argue the questions that involve the cinema notion dadasta and surrealista. Leaving of the concept of what he was dadasmo and surrealismo as artistic movements, in the first, the antiartistic one case of. The way or the form as the artists had treated on subjects or subjects the art, will not go to divergir very, exactly changing the support. Both the movements had adhered to the cinematographic language in its poetical.
What they are dadasmo and surrealismo how much art movements, as was revealed by the known cinema, films and directors more, analyses of some as Entr? act and Asleep Paris. (BRADLEY, 2004) the characteristics of one have filmed surrealista and dadasta. The performances of these artists had contributed for the form of experimentation to the new support, the flmico. It is, also argued the questions that involved the process of artistic making, valuing the psychic zones of the human, conscientious brain, unconscious subconscious mind. We can perceive that Freud is an inspirer in its theory of the psychoanalysis, the artists will go to use it as I subsidize in its works, either, in the painting, the photograph, the object, and the cinema. The commercial cinema was influenced by the proposals of the vanguards of arts.
2. What it is cinema some definitions for the word Exist cinema. According to Wilkipidia encyclopedia: The cinema (abbreviation of ' ' cinematgrafo' ' , of the Frenchman cinmatographe, made up of the Greek elements ' ' movimento' ' ' ' escrever' ') it is the technique to project fotogramas (pictures) of fast and successive form to create the movement impression, as well as the art of if producing workmanships, narratives aesthetic or not, with this technique. It understands, therefore, one technique, one communication form, an industry and an art.